How to Select and Use
Electronic Parts Outside the
Manufacturer-Specified Temperature
Range
The ratings on electronic parts and selection of their use for
an application environment are a matter of concern for engineers in all industries.
There are standards available for derating of parts that are not application specific
and often outdated. This course will discuss the part ratings, how ratings are
developed, and what their implications are in selecting the use environment for
parts to meet the reliability and performance requirements of the system.
Several industries, including avionics, automotive, military,
and telecommunication are facing problems with obtaining electronic
parts rated for the temperature range required for operation. Legacy
parts rated for extended temperature ranges (e.g., military,
industrial, automotive) are being discontinued by semiconductor
manufacturers. In addition, more advanced and affordable
functionalities (e.g., low voltage, low power) are being introduced,
but only for narrower temperature ranges. To stay competitive, both
technically and economically, industries may need to consider using
parts whose data sheet temperature limits are not broad enough to meet
the application environment. Uprating is one alternative for mitigating
this problem. This course will also introduce the participants to the
design, assembly, test, legal and cost issues related to uprating.
Examples and case studies will be presented to illustrate each point.
(This course can be customized to address electronic part derating.)
For
planning your training course, please click here. You can
also contact the calce training team
led by Prof.
Michael Pecht for more information.
Course Outline- The use of parts outside the manufacturer-specified temperature range
- Changing semiconductor marketplace
- Potential ways to meet the challenge
- Industry perceptions of uprating
- The part data sheet
- Electronic part ratings
- Absolute maximum ratings
- Recommended operating conditions
- How the ratings and conditions are determined
- Temperatures used in ratings
- Terminology variations
- Examples of part temperature ranges
- Ratings based on junction and case temperature
- Electrical performance specifications
- What is specified?
- How are the specifications determined?
- Specifications and temperature ratings
- Electrical data beyond rated temperature limit
- Electrical tests
- The uprating processes
- Parameter conformance
- Parameter re-characterization
- Stress balancing
- Assembly level testing
- The uprating methodology
- Integrate with parts selection and management
- Consider and evaluate alternatives
- Obtain and accurately interpret part information
- Determine uprating approach
- Minimize damage from additional part handling and testing
- Use appropriate test coverage for the application and evaluate and account for electrical parameter variabilities
- Follow all applicable specifications, standards and known best practices
- Determine the right margins, sample sizes, and confidence limits for your product
- Track and evaluate changes
- Control uprating process across supply chain
- Keep customers informed of uprating process and instances
- Develop and communicate appropriate maintenance information
- Document your uprating process and results
- Examples of uprating successes and failures
- Motorola MC 68332 Microcontroller
- Fairchild 74HC244N Octal 3-State Buffer
- Parts that could not be uprated
- Uprating facilities and costs
- Selection of facilities
- Types of facilities
- Examples of cost
- Assessing and mitigating legal risks associated with uprating
- The solution
- U.S. product liability theories. Who's at risk?
- U.S. measures to maximize key defenses
- Summary and future
- Standardization of process technologies
- Uprating for low temperature
- Trends in uprating practices
- Enhanced plastic devices
- Upgraded parts
- Integrated Aerospace Parts Acquisition Strategy (AQEC)
- What are the next steps?
This course has been presented to:
| Emerson Electronics |
Elgin, IL |
| Ericsson and Saab |
Stockholm, Sweden |
| Honeywell |
Tucson, AZ |
| IMAPS |
Finland |
| MoD, Israel |
Israel |
| Public Offering |
College Park, MD (3) |
| |
Portsmouth, VA |
| Raytheon |
Tucson, AZ |
| Public Offering |
Brussels, Belgium |
| Raytheon |
Rhode Island |
| Allied Signal |
Russon, AZ |
Books
|