Created: 5/21/95 Updated: 8/18/98

Flow-through Cooling with Phase Change Slurry

Project Number : C94-19

Point of Contact:

Dr. Michael Pecht
CALCE EPRC
email: Pecht@calce.umd.edu
Phone: (301) 405-5323
Fax: (301) 314-9269
Objectives Background Work Accomplised

Objectives

Characterize micro-PCM (micro-encapsulated phase change materials) augmented heat transfer fluids in flow through components. The experiments will be designed to understand the basic physics of the micro- PCM slurry. The resulting heat transfer and pressure drop models will be added to the CALCE software.

 

Background

High Prandtl number heat transfer fluids exhibit high heat transfer coefficients, particularly in offset fin applications. This has been demonstrated clearly in earlier research experiments. CALCE models incorporate physics reflecting the mechanisms of this effect. However, with PAO as the heat transfer fluid, the Prandtl number is essentially fixed by the operating temperature. One approach to altering the characteristics of the fluid is to float a slurry of particles with a large thermal capacitance. Particles consisting of phase-change material provide a promising method of increasing the Prandtl number by increasing the specific heat. In addition to the heat transfer coefficient benefits within the flow through modules, micro-PCM characteristics allow designers to significantly reduce weight and volume, a key driver in today's aircraft design.

 

Work Accomplished

The existing flow-through facility has been modified to accommodate the micro-PCM slurry. The existing gear pump was replaced with a centrifugal pump to prevent damage to the micro-slurry. The filter and the quick disconnect couplings were removed from the system because small passages in the flow loop would impede the movement of the slurry. The reservoir in the system was eliminated to minimize the total volume of the system. The resulting system now has a volume of 0.45 gallons, as opposed to 5.5 gallons in the previous system. Preliminary tests have been conducted with a PAO/CTFE (both synthetic oils) mixture without the PCM.

 A literature survey of heat transfer enhancement in phase change material slurries was conducted. It has been reported that heat transfer rates some two to four times higher than in single phase flow may be achieved with a slurry system. Surface-to-fluid temperature difference, mass flow, pumping power, and storage volume requirements were also found to be significantly reduced. It was also found that the effective thermal conductivity of the moving slurry is as much as three times the thermal conductivity of stationary suspensions.

 Experimental Effort - Experiments were conducted with a 2-pass parallel flow SEM-E module, with both the carrier fluid alone as well as with the slurry. Tests were conducted for a range of fluid flow rates and module powers. Care was taken to ensure that the PCM was uniformly entrained in the carrier fluid and did not coagulate. The turbine flow meter was calibrated individually for both the carrier fluid and the slurry. The maximum surface temperature rise of the module with the carrier fluid (PAO/CTFE mixture) was very close to the results obtained previously with PAO. In the tests conducted with the slurry, it was noticed that the maximum surface temperature rise was strongly controlled by the melting point of the PCM, and was independent of the slurry flow rate. Thus, superior thermal performance was achieved even at low flow rates with the micro-PCM slurry. This enhancement is due to the infinite heat capacity associated with the melting of the PCM and to enhanced micro-convection resulting from the carrier fluid/pellet interaction. The surface temperatures were essentially independent of the slurry flow rates. Even at the lowest flow rates tested, the latent heat capacity of the PCM was greater than the total heat supplied to the module. Therefore, the PCM in the slurry was at the melting point of the PCM. This was verified by a fluid bulk temperature measurement at the outlet of the module. A series of tests as conducted at higher slurry inlet temperatures to test the effect of inlet temperature on the thermal performance. The minimum temperature in the system was still below the freezing point of the PCM. The increased inlet temperature did not have a significant effect on module surface temperatures. Thus, the lower fluid temperature rise before melting is compensated for by the sensible heat absorbed. A key feature of the modified flow loop is the incorporation of a chiller to cool the slurry below the freezing temperature of the PCM.