| Created: 10/24/95 | Updated: 4/18/97 |
Point of Contact: |
|
| Dr. Abhijit Dasgupta
CALCE EPRC email: dasgupta@calce.umd.edu Phone: (301) 405-5251 Fax: (301) 314-9269 |
|
| Objectives | Background | Approach | Work Accomplished |
Objectives
Illustrate a physics-of-failure (pof) method for conducting accelerated stress tests cost-effectively, to obtain maximum test-time compression, using simultaneous application of different stresses. Further, illustrate quantitative approaches for assessing damage metrics, acceleration transforms and stress margins from accelerated life testing data.
Accelerated stress testing is used by industry for both life testing as well as screening. Unfortunately, there is a lot of confusion in the literature as to the most effective way to conduct accelerated tests with combination of different stresses to obtain the most test-time compression. Further, there appears to be a lack of scientific methods to extrapolate quantitatively from the test results to field durability estimates. In an effort to provide a pof-based solution to these issues, last year CALCE EPRC initiated a comprehensive multi-task, multi-year effort to explore the fundamental issues and arrive at practically useable answers. Three specific issues were identified, based on the interests of IAB members, for investigation during this phase:
Synergy between vibrational stresses and
temperature cycling stresses for test time compression
Effectiveness of repetitive shock (RS) random
vibration stresses vs. electrodynamic(ED) random vibration stresses for
test time compression of fatigue failures.
Physics-of-failure approach for deriving
quantitative damage metrics and acceleration transforms for these stresses. Year 1: Experimental phase to qualitatively compare the
effectiveness of
Simultaneous vs. sequential application
of combined temperature and vibration stresses, and
Repetitive shock (RS) vs. electro-dynamic
(ED) random vibration test machines, for accelerated stress applicationYear 3: Documentation phase to incorporate the findings of the
first two phases into standards, software tools, and guidelines for design
and testing.
The roadmap for the the multi-year project is outlined in Figure.1
Figure 1: Roadmap for the Accelerated Life Development for Combined Stresses
Summary of First Year' s Results
The task for the first year was to collect extensive experimental
data from specimens containing different technologies, different architectures,
and different manufacturing methods. A total of five specimen categories
were identified, based on member interests (Updated
specimen status). Four groups consisted of circuit card assemblies
(CCAs), since this is the most effective package level for failure stimulation
with exposure to accelerated stresses. The fifth group was a functional
LRU box, to examine the capability to stimulate failures at higher packaging
levels. Some of the specimens were daisy-chained engineering samples for
testing substrates and interconnects, while the rest were fully functional
assemblies. The schematic of the approach is shown in Figure 2
Figure 2 : Approach for Accelerated stress development
The tasks included:
design test matrix using vibration and temperature
stresses,
select and acquire test specimens,
design and fabricate test setup/fixtures,
acquire, implement and calibrate control and
data-processing hardware/software,
conduct accelerated stress tests,
collect and post-process data,
document results.The damage analysis will be different for each observed failure mechanism. The failures identified during the first year of this project, in each of the five specimen categories, will be analyzed in detail. The CALCE failure mechanism libraries will be used, whenever appropriate. The model parameters will be updated using the accelerated test data, and quantitative acceleration transforms will be illustrated using the pof approach. New models will be generated,for new mechanisms for which models are not available in the CALCE library.
The three units during this year will be allocated for stress
analysis, damage analysis, and some new testing, as follows:
Unit 1: Analyze Hamilton Standard and Hamilton Standard CCAs.
Objective 1:Generic Guidelines for Accelerated Stress Testing
One of the deliverables of this multi-year project is to establish
generic guidelines for conducting accelerated stress tests using a physics-of-failure
(PoF) based approach. For further details please refer to the Internal
report on Generic Guidelines for Accelerated Life testing using a PoF Approach.
Objective 2:Temperature-Vibration Synergy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|