| Created: 10/24/95 | Updated: 8/4/98 |
Point of Contact: | |
| Dr. Yogi Joshi CALCE EPRC email: joshi@calce.umd.edu Phone: (301) 405-5528 Fax: (301) 314-9269 |
|
| Objectives | Background | Work Accomplished |
LITERATURE REVIEW
The techniques for passive cooling of high power electronic components and systems using thermosyphons and heat pipes were studied, with special emphasis on the enhancement in heat transfer obtained. A comparison of single-phase thermosyphons and two-phase thermosyphons (liquid-vapour) showed that there is a significant enhancement in heat transfer in the latter case. The latent heat transfer in the two-phase systems allows the same amount of heat transfer at a much lower temperature difference (between the evaporator and the condenser). However, due to the high vapour pressures and volumes, the two-phase thermosyphons are slightly more complex.
A variety of working fluids, for the thermosyphon, have been investigated in the past (e.g. water, water-methanol mixture and fluorocarbon liquids). These fluids can operate in either single phase or two-phase mode. A new working fluid which shows promise is an aqueous emulsion of a phase change material (PCM). PCMs transform from solid to liquid and absorb the latent heat in the process. PCMs have been studied for heat storage systems in the past. All the studies in literature have looked at forced convection cooling, though.
DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTAL SETUP FOR THERMOSYPHON COOLING WITH PCM EMULSION
An approximate sizing of the experimental setup was performed using a resistance network. Two fin configurations were considered for the condenser, one with horizontal radial fins and the other with vertical longitudinal fins
The thermosyphon working fluids included air, de-ionized water, n-triacontane-water emulsion and FC-72 (fluorinert)
The objective of dissipating 50W/in2 in a passive environment was achieved with the vertical finned setup and deionized water as the working fluid. The PCM emulsion did not show any enhancement in the thermal performance compared to water for the single chamber construction. FC-72 resulted in higher heater temperatures for the same power levels compared to water. Thus it is not a good candidate for single-phase operation. In the two-phase mode for FC-72, while considerable thermal enhancement was observed compared to single phase operation, vapor containment was a concern. With the horizontal finned setup, the maximum heat dissipation achieved was about 30W/in2, with water as the working fluid. The vertical finned setup was found to be better for passive cooling compared to one with horizontal fins.